A Declaration of Civic Breach and Renewal

A Statement of Constitutional Concern and Proposed Restoration

Preface

This document is offered anonymously to encourage evaluation on its merits rather than on the identity, affiliation, or credentials of its author(s).

It is not presented as a manifesto, platform, or policy program, but as an attempt to articulate a legitimacy problem many citizens experience yet struggle to name: the gradual separation of governing authority from meaningful consent. The arguments herein are advanced in good faith, grounded in constitutional structure, and offered for critique, revision, or rejection on their substance alone.

Anonymity is not claimed to avoid accountability, but to preserve the focus of discussion where it properly belongs: on the reasoning presented, rather than the individuals presenting it.

- Civitas Americana

Published January 2026
United States

Preamble

When, in the course of civic life, it becomes necessary for a people to speak plainly about the condition of their government, respect for truth requires that they declare the causes which impel them to do so.

We affirm that governments are instituted among a people to secure life, liberty, property, and equal justice, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. Consent, in this tradition, is neither abstract nor automatic. It arises from membership in the sovereign political community -- citizenship -- and from participation in a shared system of rights, duties, allegiance, and representation. Where political power is exercised on behalf of persons who have not consented, cannot consent, or are not members of the sovereign people, legitimacy is diluted rather than extended.

When a government ceases to serve these ends, it does not thereby cease to exist -- but it does forfeit its claim to unquestioned legitimacy.

This declaration is not a call to violence, insurrection, or lawlessness. It is an exercise of lawful civic speech. It seeks reform, restoration, and renewal through words, reason, and constitutional means.

Signers’ Preface

This declaration is offered by citizens acting in good faith, across differences of party and belief, united only by the conviction that legitimacy requires renewal. To sign is not to reject law, nor to invite disorder, nor to claim final judgment. It is to state publicly that endurance has been long, remedies have been sought, and clarity is now required.

Signers affirm the following:

• We seek reform through lawful, peaceful, and constitutional means.
• We reject violence, intimidation, and extra-legal action.
• We accept disagreement and invite rebuttal grounded in evidence and principle.
• We reserve the right to speak plainly when legitimacy is at issue.

Signing this document is an act of civic speech, not a demand for unanimity. It is an invitation to reckon honestly with whether consent has been maintained, and if not, how it may be restored.

Statement of Principles

1. Popular sovereignty is prior to all institutions and offices. All legitimate governing authority flows from The People and is exercised only by their delegation. Constitutions, statutes, and offices are instruments of The People, not their masters.

2. Consent is ongoing, not self-executing. It must be renewed through governance that is accountable, intelligible, and responsive.

3. Lawfulness is necessary but not sufficient. Actions may be legal yet illegitimate when they are persistently destructive of the ends of government.

4. Prudence and restraint are virtues, not obligations of silence. Endurance does not require acquiescence.

5. The People are the political community. In the American constitutional tradition, “The People” is a term of art denoting those who constitute the sovereign political community: those who consent to government, who authorize its powers, who bear its obligations, and who retain the authority to reform or replace it. This term has never been synonymous with all persons physically present within the territory, but has instead referred to citizens and members of the polity as such.

Threshold of Necessity

Prudence counsels restraint in the face of grievance, and history teaches that governments long established should not be challenged for light or transient causes. Yet prudence does not require perpetual silence. When abuses persist across decades, move consistently toward insulation from accountability, and resist lawful correction despite repeated appeals, restraint ceases to be virtue and becomes neglect.

The threshold addressed here has been crossed not by a single crisis, election, or policy, but by accumulation: the normalization of emergency governance; the chronic deferral of obligations; the consolidation of authority beyond representation; and the neutralization of effective remedies. To withhold plain speech under such conditions would be to abandon the very consent that legitimizes self-government.

This declaration is therefore issued now not as a rupture, but as a necessary act of civic clarity so that reform may yet answer words, and harsher tests need never be reached.

Declaration of Breach

Whether by intention or by effect, the practices enumerated below now operate as a system that concentrates discretion, diffuses accountability, and subordinates consent to management. Where outcomes recur predictably across administrations and remedies fail regardless of electoral change, pattern may be inferred from function, even absent coordinated intent.

We hold that a long train of abuses has accumulated over decades, demonstrating a pattern of governance that has become destructive of the ends for which government is instituted. This conclusion is not drawn from isolated grievances, but from persistent, directionally consistent practices that resist lawful correction.

Mechanisms of Civic Displacement

The breaches identified herein did not arise from a single decision, moment, or faction. They emerged through identifiable mechanisms by which governing authority gradually separated from consent, and governance shifted from representation toward administration. These mechanisms operate incrementally and cumulatively, reinforcing one another and limiting the effectiveness of ordinary political correction.

Delegation Without Reversion

Authority delegated for convenience, expertise, or efficiency is rarely reclaimed in full. Powers initially transferred as limited or conditional measures tend to persist beyond their original scope, while the practical capacity of representatives to revise, narrow, or terminate those delegations diminishes over time. As authority migrates away from directly accountable bodies toward standing institutions, representative oversight weakens and democratic control becomes indirect.

Administrative Substitution for Enacted Law

Binding obligations are increasingly generated through administrative rulemaking rather than through legislation enacted by representatives directly accountable to The People. While such rules may satisfy formal requirements of legality, their proliferation shifts governance away from deliberative lawmaking toward managerial regulation. The connection between consent and coercion is thereby attenuated, as responsibility for binding norms becomes dispersed and difficult to trace.

Normalization of Emergency Authority

Powers adopted in response to crises are often retained beyond the conditions that justified their initial use. Emergency authorities -- particularly those expanding executive or administrative discretion -- may be renewed by routine process, absorbed into standing law, or preserved as precedents for future invocation. Over time, exceptional measures can alter the baseline of governance without renewed, affirmative consent, converting temporary necessity into enduring capacity.

Representation Without Constraint

Representation ceases to function as a binding constraint on authority when outcomes recur regardless of electoral change and available remedies fail to produce meaningful correction. In such conditions, representation persists procedurally but loses practical effect. Elections rotate officeholders without restoring control, and consent becomes symbolic rather than operative.

Temporal Displacement of Obligation

Decisions are increasingly made that impose long-term obligations on future citizens who neither consented to them nor possess effective means of revision. Debt accumulation, entitlement expansion, and extended commitments extend beyond electoral horizons, severing responsibility from decision-making. Authority thus evades accountability not only across institutions, but across generations.

Procedural Exhaustion of Remedies

Mechanisms nominally available for civic correction -- elections, petitions, legislative appeals, and judicial review -- may exist in form while proving ineffective in practice. Delay, complexity, jurisdictional insulation, and deference can render such remedies inadequate to correct persistent patterns. Where lawful avenues for reform remain theoretically open but practically unavailing, compliance is compelled while consent is hollowed out.

Cumulative Effect

Individually, these mechanisms may be tolerable. In combination, they produce a system in which authority expands, accountability diffuses, and consent is subordinated to administration. The resulting condition is not lawlessness, but the erosion of authorship: the government continues to operate, yet The People no longer exercise meaningful control over its direction.

This condition constitutes a civic breach not because any single institution has failed, but because the system as a whole no longer reliably converts consent into control. Where such patterns persist across decades and resist lawful correction, legitimacy is strained and reform becomes not discretionary, but necessary.

Structural Breach of Representation

Representation has been severed from consent -- not by a single act, but by the cumulative erosion of representation as a meaningful constraint on governing authority. Across domains, authority is increasingly exercised without effective dependence on the will, sovereign membership, or accountability of The People in whose name it is exercised.

Legislative authority is routinely delegated beyond recall; administrative action substitutes for enacted law; emergency powers persist beyond exigency; and remedies nominally available to The People fail to produce correction regardless of electoral change. Representation, once the mechanism by which consent bound authority, now too often functions as a procedural formality rather than a governing limit. The result is not an isolated failure, but a system in which power expands while representation ceases to restrain it.

One manifestation of this broader breach is the allocation of representational power on the basis of population rather than membership in the sovereign political community. All persons may properly be counted for purposes of enumeration, administration, and understanding the nation’s population. Apportionment and representation, however, allocate governing authority, and are therefore grounded in sovereign membership rather than physical presence. When representational power is derived from the counting of persons who are not part of “The People” in whose name government is exercised, representation is expanded without corresponding consent, civic obligation, or accountability.

This distortion arises not from any single category of persons, but from the governing rule itself: representation is enlarged by presence rather than by membership, regardless of age, citizenship status, or eligibility to participate in political consent. This practice departs from the founding-era understanding that representation flows from The People who constitute the sovereign -- those who authorize law, bear its obligations, and retain the authority to alter or abolish their government.

The result is not inclusion, but distortion: votes are weighted by presence rather than consent, and representation is detached from the community it is meant to serve. A system so arranged cannot plausibly claim to reflect the will of The People when it no longer measures The People themselves.

This claim concerns the allocation and operation of governing authority, not the denial of protection, services, or dignity to any person. Equal justice under law applies to all persons. Representation, however, must remain anchored to consent -- and to sovereign membership -- if self-government is to endure.

Among these abuses are:

• Chronic deferral of obligations, whereby promises are expanded without durable funding, shifting burdens to future generations without their consent.

• Erosion of monetary stability, diminishing the reliability of wages and savings through persistent dilution and emergency normalization.

• Consolidation of authority, transferring decisive power from representative bodies to administrative and discretionary mechanisms insulated from direct accountability.

• Selective and uneven enforcement of law, undermining equal justice and fostering the belief that rules bind some while exempting others.

• Governance by emergency, wherein temporary measures become permanent precedents without transparent justification or sunset.

• Remedy fatigue, in which lawful avenues for correction exist in form but fail in substance, leaving outcomes unchanged regardless of electoral turnover.

Taken together, these practices form a system that predictably subordinates consent of The People to managerial control, and accountability to expedience.

Exhaustion of Lawful Remedies

We affirm that lawful remedies have been pursued patiently and repeatedly through elections, petitions, litigation, and public discourse. While these mechanisms remain vital, their repeated failure to correct the underlying patterns described above constitutes a breach of trust.

We do not claim perfection of judgment. We claim good faith, sustained effort, and the right to say that endurance has reached its limit.

Reservation of Civic Authority

Accordingly, we affirm and assert:

• All legitimate governing authority belongs to The People. Political power is only one expression of that authority, delegated for limited purposes and subject to ongoing accountability.

• That The People retain the moral authority to judge the legitimacy of their government, and that this authority is real, not symbolic.

• That obedience to law does not require silence regarding illegitimacy, nor does lawful compliance exhaust civic duty.

• That moral consent may be withdrawn incrementally and expressed cumulatively through peaceful speech, lawful assembly, petition, and constitutional action.

• That reform, not disorder, remains our object; restoration, not rupture, our preference precisely because delay increases the risk of disorder.

This distinction does not deny the dignity, humanity, or legal protection owed to all persons. Equal justice under law applies to persons. All legitimate governing authority, however, belongs to The People. To confuse these categories is not to advance equality, but to dissolve self-government by detaching authority from those who are entitled -- and obligated -- to exercise it.

Appeal

We appeal to our fellow citizens to consider these claims soberly and without faction. We appeal to those who hold office to recognize that authority endures only where legitimacy is maintained. We appeal in particular to those institutions entrusted with constitutional correction -- legislatures, conventions, and the states -- to exercise the authority the Constitution already vests in them. We appeal to posterity to judge whether these words were spoken too soon -- or too late.

Consequence of Non-Response

Failure to address the breaches herein will not preserve stability. It will further erode consent, harden enforcement, and narrow the space for lawful correction. Reform undertaken now conserves order; reform deferred risks outcomes no one prefers.

Remedies for Restoration and Renewal

The following remedies are proposed not as partisan preferences, but as necessary structural reforms to restore legitimacy, consent, and coherence to republican self-government. These provisions are stated with precision because history demonstrates that broad grants, vague standards, and adjustable thresholds invite circumvention, expansion, and abuse inconsistent with republican self-government. They are to demonstrate seriousness and coherence, not to foreclose debate or lawful revision through constitutional process. They are offered in good faith, grounded in first principles, and ordered toward reform rather than rupture.

I. Sovereignty, Membership, and Law

1. Border Integrity and Membership Enforcement
   The United States must exercise effective control over its borders and enforce its immigration laws. Unlawful presence cannot confer political standing. Sovereignty requires the ability to define membership, and finality in enforcement is essential to legitimacy.

2. Citizen-Based Representation
   Enumeration shall count all persons for purposes of knowledge, administration, and planning; apportionment and representation shall count only members of the sovereign political community, by whom governing authority is authorized and to whom it must remain accountable.

   For purposes of apportionment and representation, the Census shall distinctly enumerate citizens as a subset of that enumeration. This reform does not exclude persons from protection or service, but restores representation to its constitutional foundation: The People who constitute the sovereign political community. Representation derived from consent cannot be sustained where it is allocated by presence alone.

3. State Cooperation with Federal Law Enforcement
   States and localities must not obstruct federal enforcement of duly enacted law within enumerated federal domains. Cooperative federalism requires operational compliance, not selective resistance.

4. Federal Land Rebalancing to The People
   The Federal Government shall divest no less than 50 percent of its surface land holdings by acreage over a defined transition period.

• Exclusions: This mandate shall not apply to National Parks designated prior to 2025, active military installations, or essential federal infrastructure.

• Priority of Transfer: Divestment shall prioritize transfer to individual citizens, homesteading grants, and State management trusts. Auction mechanisms shall include acreage caps to prevent concentrated corporate capture.

• Debt Lockbox: All proceeds from such divestment shall be applied exclusively to the retirement of the principal of the national debt and shall not be treated as general revenue for spending.

II. Fiscal Discipline and Truth in Governance

1. Balanced Budget Requirement
   Congress must pass a balanced budget on schedule each fiscal year. Chronic deficit spending constitutes intergenerational taxation without representation or consent and undermines democratic accountability.

2. No New Net Debt and a Debt Retirement Plan
   The United States shall not increase its net public debt outside of formally declared wars or existential emergencies approved by supermajority. A mandatory, published debt retirement schedule shall require annual primary surpluses until the debt-to-economy ratio is reduced to sustainable levels.

3. Spending Growth Limits
   Federal spending growth shall be capped to population growth plus inflation, absent a formally declared emergency approved by supermajority.

4. Truth-in-Budgeting and Long-Horizon Disclosure
   All budgets and major spending authorizations must include transparent, standardized disclosure of ten‑, twenty‑, and thirty‑year costs, including off‑balance‑sheet obligations and deferred liabilities.

5. Emergency Powers Reform
   All emergency authorities must include automatic expiration, mandatory legislative reauthorization, and retrospective review. Temporary necessity must not become permanent governance.

III. Taxation and Shared Civic Burden

1. Uniform Income Tax
   A single, flat income tax of 12 percent shall apply to all citizens without exemption. Universal participation restores shared civic responsibility and prevents factional redistribution through the tax code.

2. Uniform Consumption Tax (Value-Added Tax)
   A broad-based 15 percent value-added tax (VAT) shall apply to goods and services.

• To prevent undue hardship without creating new entitlement bureaucracies, unprepared food, prescription medicine, and residential utilities shall be exempt (Zero-Rated) from the VAT. This ensures that the tax burden falls on discretionary consumption, not on survival. No other credits, deductions, or graduated rates shall be introduced.

• Abolition of the Payroll Tax:
  This structure replaces the regressive Payroll Tax system entirely. By eliminating the tax wedge on labor, this plan immediately increases the take-home pay of the working class and lowers the cost of hiring. The working poor gain purchasing power, as their essential spending remains untaxed while their earnings are relieved of the payroll burden.

3. Uniform Corporate Tax on Profits
   A flat 25 percent corporate tax shall apply to profits, with a simplified base and minimal carve‑outs to prevent rent‑seeking and unequal treatment.

4. Abolition of Hidden Redistribution
   Redistribution, if undertaken, must occur through explicit appropriations rather than deductions, credits, or opaque mechanisms embedded in the tax code.

5. Tax Administration Modernization and Civilian De‑Criminalization
   Where the government can calculate liability from third‑party reporting, citizens shall not be criminalized for paperwork error. Default filing and simple settlement mechanisms should be provided, with enforcement priorities focused on complex evasion schemes and organizational entities.

IV. Representation, Accountability, and Rotation

1. Term Limits for Federal Elected Office
   The President shall be limited to two terms; Senators to two terms; Members of the House to four terms. Rotation in office preserves representation and curbs institutional capture.

2. Ban on Omnibus Legislation and “Read Before Vote” Requirements
   No single bill shall combine unrelated subjects into a single vote. Appropriations shall be enacted through discrete, publicly available bills with mandatory public posting windows and attestation procedures to ensure meaningful review.

3. Regulatory and Statutory Simplification (“One‑In, One‑Out”)
   For each new statutory mandate enacted, an existing statutory mandate of comparable scope shall be repealed, unless a supermajority declares necessity. The object is intelligibility of law and restoration of citizen comprehension.

4. Restoration of Congressional Lawmaking Authority
   Major policy decisions must be made by Congress through legislation. Broad delegation of lawmaking authority to administrative bodies must be curtailed.

5. Officeholder Ethics, Trading Bans, and Transparency
   Members of Congress and senior federal officials shall be subject to real‑time public financial disclosure; a comprehensive ban on individual stock trading by officials, spouses, and dependents while in office; independent audits; and severe penalties for concealment, conflicts of interest, or enrichment through public power.

V. Judicial and Legal Integrity

1. Limits on Judicial Injunctions
   Federal district judges shall not issue nationwide injunctions. Judicial relief must be limited to parties before the court, preserving separation of powers and public confidence in neutrality.

2. Single‑Subject Rule for Legislation
   All federal legislation shall address a single subject clearly expressed in its title. Violations shall render the bill void.

3. Mandatory Read‑Before‑Vote and Public Posting
   All bills must be publicly available in final form for a minimum review period prior to any vote, with sworn attestation by voting members.

4. Agency Sunset and Reauthorization
   Federal agencies and major programs shall automatically sunset absent periodic, affirmative congressional reauthorization based on performance and necessity.

5. Line‑Item Veto for Appropriations
   A constitutionally authorized line‑item veto shall permit the removal of discrete spending items while preserving the remainder of appropriations bills.

VI. Electoral, Monetary, and Privacy Legitimacy

1. Electoral Process Integrity
   Uniform, transparent standards for ballots, verification, auditing, and chain‑of‑custody shall be established to ensure outcomes are accepted as binding regardless of factional interest.

2. Hard‑Asset Backing of the Currency
   Every dollar in circulation shall be fully backed by verifiable reserves or binding issuance constraints sufficient to preserve purchasing power and public trust, including but not limited to hard assets such as gold, silver, and strategic commodities. Paper promises shall not substitute for real assets. Monetary issuance must reflect tangible backing.

3. Monetary Discipline and Transparency
   Monetary expansion outside defined emergencies must be limited, publicly justified, independently audited, and accompanied by disclosure of long‑term and distributional effects.

4. Prohibition on Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDC)
   The United States Government, the Federal Reserve, and their agents are prohibited from issuing, adopting, or mandating the use of any Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) or programmable fiat currency. Money shall remain a neutral bearer instrument; it shall not function as a tool of surveillance, censorship, or behavioral control.

5. Protection of Private Currency Competition
   The right of citizens to mine, own, custody, and transact in decentralized digital assets, specie, or private commodity monies shall not be infringed. The exchange of such assets for goods and services shall not be a taxable event (Capital Gains neutrality), ensuring open competition with the sovereign currency.

6. Federal Privacy Rights with Enforcement Teeth
   A comprehensive federal privacy law shall establish clear rights to data minimization, purpose limitation, consent, access, deletion, and portability. Warrantless surveillance -- direct or indirect -- shall be prohibited.

7. Ban on Government Purchase of Commercial Surveillance
   Government entities shall not obtain personal data through commercial intermediaries to evade warrant or consent requirements. Subscription access to mass‑surveillance platforms shall be prohibited absent individualized judicial authorization.

8. Citizen Opt‑Out and Redress
   Citizens shall have a clear, enforceable right to opt out of non‑essential data collection and automated surveillance systems, with private rights of action and meaningful penalties for violation.

VII. Entitlements, Health Care, and Intergenerational Fairness

1. Social Security Conversion to Individually Owned Accounts
   The Social Security system shall be converted from pay‑as‑you‑go transfers to individually owned retirement accounts, structured on a Diversified Index Model with participant‑selected risk profiles. Contributions shall be credited to the individual and invested for long‑term compounding.

2. Full Benefit Honor for Current and Prior Contributors
   Obligations to current retirees and those who paid under the prior system shall be honored in full. Means testing shall not be used to reduce earned benefits. Transition financing may include a time‑limited authority to carry debt solely to meet legacy obligations while the new funded system matures.

3. Optional Transition Settlement to Individual Accounts
   As an alternative to legacy benefit continuation, an eligible taxpayer may elect a transition settlement equal to the employee and employer contributions paid on their behalf, credited to their individual retirement account for self‑management. Election shall be by the taxpayer, not by administrative discretion.

4. Repeal of Affordable Care Act Subsidy Architecture
   The subsidy and mandate framework commonly known as the Affordable Care Act shall be repealed in its entirety. Federal policy shall favor competition, price transparency, portability, and market entry rather than permanent subsidization.

5. Medicare Modernization and Optional Privatization Path
   Medicare shall be preserved for current beneficiaries and modernized for long‑term sustainability. A structured path to competitive private plan delivery may be established provided coverage obligations are met and fraud and rent‑seeking are constrained.

6. Medicaid Limited to Citizens
   Medicaid eligibility shall be limited to citizens. Public benefits grounded in political obligation and collective financing must be administered consistent with sovereign membership rules, while emergency and humanitarian care shall remain available to all persons as required by law.

7. Termination of Federal Educational Lending and Guarantees
   The federal government shall not issue, guarantee, insure, or subsidize loans for higher education. The centralization of educational credit has severed price from value, fueled hyper-inflation in tuition costs, and reduced higher education to a vehicle for debt serfdom and ideological capture. All existing federal student lending programs shall be wound down. Future lending must return to the private market, where risk assessment and bankruptcy protections restore price discipline to universities and accountability to borrowers. The government shall not function as the creditor of its own citizens.

8. The Inviolability of Veteran Obligations
   Payments for service-connected injury are not "disability" benefits; they are Sovereign Indemnity. They represent the amortized cost of bodily and mental loss incurred in the specific performance of constitutional defense. Unlike welfare, which is based on need, this compensation is based on debt. Given that fact, funding for veteran healthcare and compensation shall be classified as sovereign debt obligations, protected from sequestration, means-testing, or political negotiation, identical in priority to the interest on the national debt. The inviolability of this obligation ensures that the true, permanent cost of conflict remains visible on the national ledger, serving as a necessary fiscal restraint against reckless foreign intervention.

Conclusion

These remedies are demanding because the breach they address is serious. They do not promise comfort, perfection, or unanimity. They promise only the restoration of consent through truth, accountability, and shared obligation.

If legitimacy is renewed through reform, order is preserved. If reform is deferred, legitimacy will continue to erode, and governance will harden where consent once sufficed.

Obedience to law persists not because legitimacy is unquestioned, but because order itself is a common good, and lawful correction is preferable to rupture even under strain.

This declaration and its remedies are offered so that words may yet be enough.

Adopted and declared in good faith, in lawful assembly, and in the conviction that civic clarity is the surest guardian of peace.

-Civitas Americana

---

Read the Civitas Papers | Download Full Declaration PDF